Comparison of Personnel Reform of the United States and Australia
Downloads
The role and function of the personnel system in the bureaucracy of a country is a critical, strategic, and decisive success factor. The size and quality of a country's bureaucracy determines whether it is superior or poor. For this reason, bureaucratic ability to change is needed in order to grow thoroughly and consistently, one of which is through research on best practices of personnel reform in other countries. This study aims to conduct benchmarking/comparative analysis of personnel system reform in the United States and Australia, which is based on the development of their respective staffing systems, using qualitative research methods and data collection techniques from literature studies. Position, job classification, and compensation, as well as training and development; to be used as comparison and assessment information. Based on the findings of this comparative study, each reform of the State Civil Apparatus has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Copyright (c) 2023 Shinta Maharani, Effy Zalfiana Rusfian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


