Systematic Literature Review: Inconsistencies and Developments in Ownership Structure and Board Characteristics in Sustainability Reporting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v4i2.2438Keywords:
sustainability reporting;, ownership structure;, board characteristics;, corporate governanceAbstract
This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method to analyze inconsistencies and developments in ownership structure and board characteristics concerning sustainability reporting. Sustainability reporting has emerged as a pivotal tool for corporations to showcase their economic, social, and environmental responsibilities. However, significant discrepancies exist in the relationship between ownership structures, board attributes, and the quality of sustainability disclosures globally. Drawing upon 37 relevant articles published between 2015 and 2024, this research identifies critical trends and gaps. Ownership structures, including foreign, institutional, and family ownership, show varied impacts on sustainability reporting across developed, developing, and mixed-economy countries. For instance, foreign ownership often drives transparency in developing nations due to external pressures, while governmental ownership exhibits mixed effects depending on regulatory and market dynamics. Similarly, board characteristics like gender diversity, independence, and the presence of sustainability committees significantly influence the quality of sustainability disclosures. These relationships, however, are subject to regional governance maturity and cultural norms. The study highlights the dominance of quantitative methodologies in existing literature, with limited exploration of mixed-method approaches. Findings also reveal that inconsistencies in results are rooted in differences in regulatory environments, market pressures, and cultural expectations. Developed nations exhibit greater adherence to stringent sustainability standards, while developing countries face challenges in harmonizing local priorities with global frameworks. By addressing these inconsistencies, this research contributes to advancing the understanding of ownership and governance dynamics in sustainability reporting. It also underscores the need for globally harmonized reporting standards to ensure consistent, high-quality sustainability practices.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mona Nur Adhillah, Inten Meutia, Shelly Febriana Kartasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.