Comparing 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine For Peribulbar Blockade In Vitrectomy Surgery Towards Intraocular Pressure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i5.2085Keywords:
levobupivacaine, peribulbar blockade, ropivacaine, vitrectomyAbstract
Peribulbar blockade is a regional anesthetic technique that can be used for vitrectomy surgery. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are local anesthetics that have the advantage of a long duration of action and a lower complication rate than bupivacaine. This study aims to find the effect of intraocular pressure from ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. The study design was a double-blind randomized controlled trial on 60 patients underwent vitrectomy at Netra Ophthalmic Clinic Bandung with peribulbar blockade. Twenty-nine subjects received 0.75% ropivacaine and thirty-one subjects received 0.5% levobupivacaine for peribulbar blockade. Assessment of eye intraocular pressure was assessed before the block, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, and 15 minutes. The 0.75% ropivacaine group obtained an average of 4.42mmHg at 15 minutes, while the 0.5% levobupivacaine group averaged 2.33mmHg after 15 minutes after injection. Statistical results obtained p value <0.05 which means significant intraocular pressure of the two drugs. Intraocular pressure of ropivacaine 0.75% lower than levobupivacaine 0.5% in peribulbar blockade in vitrectomy surgery.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Doddy Tavianto, Ricky Aditya, Dian Irawati, Aria Annasya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


