JOSR: Journal of Social Research
November 2022, 1 (12), 558-565
p-ISSN: 2827-9832 e-ISSN: xxxx-xxxx
Available online at http:// https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr
http://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr
COMPARISON OF CONSISTENCY VALUE OF ABSORBENT
DOSE OF PLASTISIN AND SILICONE BOLUS USING
ELECTRON WITH 6 MEV ENERGY AT SANGLAH RSUP
DENPASAR
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia
Akademi Teknik Radiodiagnostik Dan Radioterapi Bali (Atro Bali)
12,3
dwipax@gmail.com
1
,ekaj.atro@gmail.com
2
,coryamelia999@gmail.com
3
Abstrak (indonesia)
Received:25
Oktober
2022
Revised :31
Oktober
2022
Accepted:04
November
2022
Latar Belakang: Radioterapi merupakan suatu
modalitas di bidang kedokteran yang berperan dalam
pengobatan penyakit keganasan dengan
memanfaatkan sinar pengion dengan memberikan
dosis letal ke sel kanker dengan memberikan
kerusakan yang seminimal mungkin pada sel normal.
Tujuan: dilakukan penelitian terkait adalah
mengetahui perbandingan konsistensi dosis serap
kedua bahan tersebut pada energi 6 MeV.
Metode: menggunakan penelitian dengan pengolahan
data kuantitatif deskriptif untuk mengetahui
perbandingan konsistensi nilai dosis serap bolus
berbahan plastisin dan bolus berbahan silikon pada
energi 6 MeV. Untuk mengetahui konsistensi nilai
dosis serap bolus berbahan plastisin dan berbahan
silikon dengan ketebalan masing masing 1 cm.
Hasil: didapatkan hasil nilai dosis serap yang nilainya
bervariasi setiap harinya. Dimana untuk nilai dosis
serap bolus berbahan plastisin rentang nilai dosis
serapnya adalah 1,390 Gy sampai dengan 1,413 Gy,
dengan persentase rata-rata deviasinya adalah 0,15%.
Kesimpulan: Nilai dosis serap yang diperoleh dengan
menggunakan elektron energi 6 MeV selama 25 fraksi
penyinaran didapatkan hasil nilai dosis serap yang
nilainya sedikit bervariasi setiap harinya, Dimana
untuk nilai dosis serap bolus berbahan plastisin
rentang nilai dosis serapnya adalah 1,390 Gy sampai
dengan 1,413 Gy, dengan persentase rata-rata
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 559
deviasinya adalah -0,38%, sedangkan untuk bolus
berbahan Silikon rentang nilai dosis serapnya adalah
1,749 Gy sampai dengan 1,777 Gy, dengan persentase
rata-rata deviasinya adalah 1,061. Rentang deviasi
konsistensi dosis serap dari bolus berbahan plastisin
adalah 0,002 dan rentang deviasi bolus berbahan
silikon adalah 0,009.
Kata kunci: Absorben bolus; Radioterapi; dosis
serap; konsistensi dosis serap
Abstract (English)
Background: Radiotherapy is a modality in the
medical field that plays a role in the treatment of
malignancy by utilizing ionizing rays by giving a
lethal dose to cancer cells by causing minimal
damage to normal cells.
Objective: related research is to know the
comparison of the consistency of the absorbed dose
of the two materials at an energy of 6 MeV.
Methods: used research with descriptive quantitative
data processing to compare the consistency of the
absorption dose values for boluses made from
plasticine and boluses made from silicon at 6 MeV
energy. To determine the consistency of the value of
the absorption dose of boluses made of plasticine
and silicone with a thickness of 1 cm each.
Results: The results obtained the value of the
absorbed dose which the value varies every day.
Where for the absorption dose of bolus made from
plasticine, the absorption dose ranges from 1.390 Gy
to 1.413 Gy, with the average deviation percentage
being 0.15%.
Conslusion: The absorbed dose value obtained by
using 6 MeV energy electrons for 25 irradiation
fractions resulted in the absorption dose value which
varies slightly every day, where for the absorption
dose value of plasticine-based bolus the absorption
dose value range is 1.390 Gy to 1.413 Gy, with an
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 560
average percentage The average deviation is -0.38%,
while for boluses made from Silicon, the absorption
dose ranges from 1.749 Gy to 1.777 Gy, with the
average deviation percentage being 1.061. The
deviation range of the consistency of the absorbed
dose from the plasticine-based bolus was 0.002 and
the deviation range of the silicone-based bolus was
0.009.
Keywords: Bolus absorbent; Radiotherapy; absorbed
dose; absorption dose consistency
*Correspondent Author : Made Dwipa Nararta
Email : dwipax@gmail.com
BACKGROUND
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death and an important barrier to
increasing life expectancy in every country in the world. According to estimates
from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019, cancer is the first or second
cause of death before the age of 70 in 112 of 183 countries and ranks third or
fourth in 23 other countries (Beyzadeoglu, Ozyigit, & Ebruli, 2010). The
increasing prominence of cancer as the leading cause of death in part reflects the
sharp decline in mortality from stroke and coronary heart disease when compared
with cancer in many countries. Of all types of cancer, breast cancer in women
showed the highest percentage of new cases when compared to 36 other types of
cancer, which was recorded in GLOBOCAN 2020 as many as 2,261,419 new
cases (11.7%) (Huq, 2006).
Based on Basic Health Research (Riskesdas) data in 2018, the prevalence
of tumors/cancer in Indonesia showed an increase from 1.4/1,000 population in
2013 to 1.79/1,000 population in 2018, where the highest incidence of cancer in
women is cancer. breast, which is 42.1% / 100,000 population with an average
mortality of 17% (Kemenkes RI, 2018). The reported province of Bali has a fairly
high prevalence of cancer/tumor, namely 2.27% with 16,481 million cases
(RISKESDAS, 2018). It is also supported by data taken at the Dharmais Cancer
Hospital in 2018 showing that the highest cancer cases in Indonesia are breast
cancer at 19.18%, followed by cervical cancer at 10.69%, and lung cancer at
9.89% (Kemenkes RI). , 2019). With a high prevalence, the role of curative
modalities is in the spotlight to increase the life expectancy of these cancer
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 561
patients. One of the modalities that has become the gold standard as a curative
effort for cancer cases is radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy is a modality in the field of medicine that plays a role in the
treatment of malignancy by utilizing ionizing rays by giving a lethal dose to cancer
cells by causing minimal damage to normal cells. These ionizing rays can be
electrons, X-rays, and gamma rays. In principle, the treatment method of
radiotherapy with ionizing rays is to expose it to cancer tissue with external
radiation (Beyzadeoglu et al., 2010).
Effective dosing is still a challenge in the application of radiotherapy in
cancer patients. Giving a wide and excessive radiation field has the risk that too
many healthy organs are involved in the radiation so that it will damage normal
tissue, and cause tissue death, while a dose that is insufficient/inadequate to kill
cancer cells will cause relapse/residence. It is endeavored that the radiation dose
given to the tumor must be uniformly or homogeneously distributed in accordance
with the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU)
guidelines, namely the maximum dose in the 95%-107% range. By planning
therapy and giving the right dose of cancer will get the optimum dose and will
determine the therapy. In its development, Linear Accelerator (LINAC) is present
as an effective radiotherapy modality in carrying out more accurate radiation.
LINAC is a radiotherapy device that uses high-frequency electromagnetic
waves by accelerating electron-charged particles so that they can irradiate tumor
targets both superficially and at depth (Mirul, 1930). In irradiating breast cancer in
mastectomy conditions or cancer cells located in the superficial area, electron
beams from the LINAC and Bolus are usually used as tools (Wong et al., 2020).
Bolus is a material whose attenuation coefficient and attenuation is equivalent to
that of human body tissue which is placed directly on the body surface which
serves to increase the dose on the skin surface, even out uneven body contours,
and as compensation for the removed body tissue. The ideal bolus material is one
that has the same attenuity coefficient as human tissue, is able to stop light
scattering and must be flexible and easy to shape according to the patient's various
body surfaces, and most importantly not harmful to the patient's skin (Wong et al. ,
2020).
The most frequently used bolus material today is a plasticine-based bolus.
However, plasticine is very flexible and when pressed it cannot return to its
original shape. This of course can reduce the optimization of the bolus in terms of
the consistency of the absorbed dose from the beginning of the fraction to the end.
Based on the coefficient and attenuation values equivalent to human body tissue,
Silicone Rubber is an alternative to be used as a bolus material to replace
plasticine. To ensure the consistency of the absorption dose values for boluses
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 562
made of plasticine and silicone, further research is needed that compares boluses
made of plasticine with other materials, namely Silicon Ruber which is another
material for making boluses. (Purba, 2018)("View of Study of the Use of Silicone
Rubber Boluses on Surface Dosing in Electron Beam Radiotherapy," 2020) Based
on this background the authors are interested in conducting research to test and
compare the consistency of the absorbed dose values of the two materials and raise
them to a in a study entitled "Comparison of Absorbed Dose Consistency of Bolus
Made of Plasticine and Silicon on Electrons with 6 MeV Energy at Sanglah
Hospital Denpasar".
METODE PENELITIAN
In this study, the authors used research with descriptive quantitative data
processing to compare the consistency of the absorption dose values for boluses
made from plasticine and boluses made from silicon at 6 MeV energy.
Independent Variables; The independent variable is the variable that causes
changes in the dependent variable. The independent variables in this study were
boluses made of plasticine, boluses made of silicone. Dependent variable; The
dependent variable (bound) is the variable that is affected. The dependent variable
(bound) in this study was the reading of the absorbed dose of a bolus of 1 cm
thickness at a depth of 2 cm (with phantom). Control Variables; The control
variable (constant) is a variable that is controlled or fixed so that the relationship
of the independent variable (free) to the dependent variable (constant) in this
study, namely electrons with an energy of 6 MeV, 25 radiation fractions, slab
phantom, ionization chamber, electrometer, temperature and humidity storage
space.
Data analysis begins with obtaining the results obtained from the
electrometer as many as 25 fractions. From the data and information obtained
through recording the value of the absorbed dose reading on the electrometer, it
will be analyzed further by calculating the deviation from the absorbed dose
received per day. From the results of the data that has been processed, it will be
obtained the consistency of the absorption dose of plasticine and silicon bolus
doses with an energy of 6 MeV. The difference will be seen by using SPSS by
applying the difference test of 2 variables. With the Independent T Test Difference
Test if it is normally distributed or Mann-Whitney if the distribution of the data to
be obtained is not normal with reference to the value of 0.05, so that conclusions
can be drawn based on the hypothesis: The hypothesis is rejected (H0) if the
significance value of p value < 0 0.05 means that there is a significant difference
between the consistency of the two boluses.
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 563
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the measurement of the absorbed dose of the two bolus
materials The process of evaluating the consistency of the value of the absorbed
bolus dose at the radiotherapy installation of the Sanglah Central General
Hospital, measurements were made on the phantom without using a bolus once as
a comparison for the value of the absorbed dose using a detector at a depth of 2
cm with a field area of 10 x 10 cm and SSD 100 cm. From this measurement, the
absorbed dose from the phantom slab was 1.818 Gy. Subsequent measurements
for 25 fractions with the same treatment were added using both bolus materials.
The results obtained from measurements of room temperature and pressure and
electrometer readings are the absorbed dose value in Gy units for 25 fractions
(attachment 1) whose characteristics can be seen in Table 4.1 as follows.
On the first day, the result was 1,409 Gy for plasticine bolus and 1,749 Gy
for Silicone bolus, these results were then used as a reference for calculating the
consistency of the absorbed dose. To measure the average percentage deviation
from the consistency of the absorbed dose, the following equation is used:
Percentage Deviation = (absorbed dose value-consistency reference)/(consistency
reference) x 100 Reference value: plasticine bolus 1.409 Gy Silicone Bolus 1.749
Gy
Statistical Test Results Absorb Dose Value Consistency
Based on the data obtained in the form of dose values and characteristics of
dose deviations in both types of boluses, the researchers conducted statistical tests
to be able to see the significance of differences in the distribution of absorbed dose
values and their deviations. Before carrying out the different test, the researchers
tested the normality of the data obtained with the following results: By using 6
MeV energy for 25 fractions of irradiation, it was obtained that the absorbed dose
value varied slightly every day. 1.390 Gy to 1.413 Gy, with an average deviation
percentage of -0.38%, while for boluses made from Silicon, the absorption dose
ranges from 1.749 Gy to 1.777 Gy, with an average deviation percentage of
1.061%,
From the measurement results described in Tables 4.1 and 4.2, it can be
seen that there is a difference in the value of the consistency of the two bolus
materials where the average value of the absorbed dose of plasticine is 1.404 Gy
and the average value of deviation of the absorbed dose is 0.002 Gy for 25
irradiation fractions. bolus made of silicon, the average value of the absorbed dose
was 1.767 Gy and the deviation value was 0.09 Gy for 25 fractions. The results of
the MannWhitney Statistical Test showed that there was no significant difference
in the absorbed dose produced in the two types of boluses. This is due to several
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 564
factors, namely differences in temperature, air pressure, humidity, and the
calibration factor of the electrometer. (IAEA, 2000) The two bolus materials have
very good consistency values, there is no significant difference in consistency, it
can also be considered from several factors, namely the absorption capacity of the
silicone bolus is better than plasticine where the average absorption dose of the
two bolus materials is closest to the measurement results. slab phantom without
using a bolus material with an absorption dose of 1.818 Gy, where the average
absorption dose of plasticine bolus is 1.404 Gy and a bolus made of silicon with an
average absorption dose of 1.767 Gy not much different. It can also be seen in
terms of efficiency and economy of the two bolus materials, where plasticine is
easier to obtain, the manufacturing process is short, and the price of the material is
cheap compared to silicone boluses.
CONCLUSION
Based on the description of the results and discussion in the research that
has been carried out, the following conclusions are obtained; The absorbed dose
value obtained by using 6 MeV energy electrons for 25 irradiation fractions
resulted in the absorption dose value which varies slightly every day, where for the
absorption dose value of bolus made of plasticine, the absorption dose value range
is 1.390 Gy to 1.413 Gy, with an average percentage The average deviation is -
0.38%, while for boluses made from Silicon, the absorption dose ranges from
1.749 Gy to 1.777 Gy, with the average deviation percentage being 1.061. The
deviation range of the consistency of the absorbed dose from the plasticine-based
bolus was 0.002 and the deviation range of the silicone-based bolus was 0.009.
There was no significant difference in the deviation value of the absorbed
dose in the plasticine and silicon bolus referring to the Mann-Whitney test results
which showed a p-Value of 0.133 or > 0.05, which means that there was no
significant difference in the consistency of the absorbed dose shown by the two
bolus materials. Based on the average value of the absorbed dose and the deviation
range value of the absorbed dose of the two bolus materials in the statistical test
using SPSS, the plasticine-based bolus showed a higher deviation value than the
silicone-based bolus. Plasticine-based bolus showed better consistency in the
application of 25 times fractionation.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Beyzadeoglu, Murat, Ozyigit, Gokhan, & Ebruli, Cuneyt. (2010). Basic radiation
oncology. In Basic Radiation Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-
11666-7
Huq, M. Saiful. (2006). Absorbed dose determination in external beam
Made Dwipa Nararta1,Putu Eka Juliantara
2
,Cory Amelia/ JOSR: Journal of Social Research,
1(12), 558-565
comparison of consistency value of absorbent dose of plastisin and silicone
bolus using electron with 6 mev energy at sanglah rsup denpasar 565
radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on
standards of absorbed dose to water.
IAEA. (2000). IAEA TRS 398:Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam
Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on
Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. 12(June), 183.
Kemenkes RI. (2018). Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar Tahun 2018. Kementrian
Kesehatan RI, 53(9), 16891699.
Kemenkes RI. (2019). Infodatin-cancer burden 2019. Jakarta: Ministry of Health
RI., 36.
Mirul, Ka. (1930). Prinsip Kerja Akselerator Linier (LINAC).
Purba, marintan handayani. (2018). Konsistensi Nilai Dosis Serap Bolus Plastisin
Dengan Energi 9 MeV dI Rumah Sakit Pusat Pertamina.
RISKESDAS. (2018). Laporan Provinsi Bali RISKESDAS 2018. In Badan
Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan.
View of Studi Penggunaan Bolus Berbahan Silicone Rubber terhadap Dosis
Permukaan pada Radioterapi Berkas Elektron. (2020).
Wong, Gina, Lam, Emily, Bosnic, Sandi, Karam, Irene, Drost, Leah, Yee, Caitlin,
Ariello, Krista, Chow, Edward, & Wronski, Matt. (2020). Quantitative Effect
of Bolus on Skin Dose in Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Journal of
Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. Journal of Medical Imaging and
Radiation Sciences, 51, 462469.
© 2021 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under
the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA)
license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).