JOSR: Journal of Social Research
Oktober 2022, 1 (11), 286-297
p-ISSN: 2827-9832 e-ISSN: xxxx-xxxx
Available online at http:// https://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr
http://ijsr.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/ijsr
CONVENIENT ELECTION CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
(CASE STUDY OF THE 2018 SOUTH CENTRAL ELECTIONS)
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu
Universitas Nusa Cendana
akedabu@gmail.com
Abstrak (indonesia)
Received:26
September
2022
Revised :06
Oktober
2022
Accepted:14
Oktober
2022
Latar Belakang: Konflik Pilkada TTS Tahun 2018
disebabkan oleh adnya ketidak lengkapan dan ketidak
autentikan dokumen untuk melakukan pemilihan
yakni formulir model C1-KWK asli berhologram dan
formulir model C1 Plano-KWK asli berhologram pada
30 TPS.
Tujuan: Mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis
Manajemen Konflik Pilkada Kabupaten Timor Tengah
Selatan pada Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2018.
Metode: kualitatif. Lokasi Penelitian : Kabupaten
Timor Tengah Selatan. Fokus penelitian : Manajemen
Konflik Model Intervensi Pihak Ketiga yang terdiri
atas konsiliasi, negosiasi, mediasi dan arbitersi.
Teknik penentuan informan : purposive sampling.
Teknik pengumpulan data : wawancara dan
dokumentasi.
Hasil: Negosiasi: Pertemuan KPU TTS dengan Paslon
No.2 terjadi pada tahapan sengketa hasil pemilu
bertujuan untuk membahas temuan-temuan yang
menjadi keberatan Paslon No.2 pada Pilkada TTS
tahun 2018. Pertemuan itu dihadiri Paslon No.2
beserta beberapa saksi TPS dan tim sukses dan dari
pihak keamanan”.
Kesimpulan: Konflik Pilkada Kabupaten TTS tahun
2018 terjadi pada tahap sengketa hasil pemilu, hal ini
disebabkan karena pada Penetapan Rekapitulasi
Hasil Penghitungan Suara Pemilihan Bupati dan
Wakil Bupati Timor Tengah Selatan Tahun 2018
adanya ketidaklengkapan dan ketidakautentikan
dokumen untuk melakukan pemilihan yakni Formulir
Model C1-KWK asli berhologram dan Formulir
Model C1.Plano-KWK asli berhologram pada 30
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 287
TPS sehingga perolehan suaranya tidak terjamin
validitasnya. Konflik terjadi antara salah satu
pasangan calon (Drs. Obed Naitboho, M.Si dan
Alexander Kase, S.Pdk) dengan KPU TTS selaku
penyelenggara Pemilu.
Kata kunci: Konflik; Pilkada; Abiterasi; Mediasi
dan Konsiliasi.
Abstract (English)
Background: The 2018 TTS Pilkada conflict was
caused by incomplete and inauthentic documents to
conduct the election, namely the original hologram
C1-KWK model form and the original hologram C1
Plano-KWK model form at 30 polling stations.
Objective: Describe and analyze the Conflict
Management of the South Central Timor Regency
Pilkada in the 2018 Simultaneous Regional Head
Elections.
Methods: qualitative. Research Location : South
Central Timor Regency. Research focus: Third Party
Intervention Model Conflict Management which
consists of conciliation, negotiation, mediation and
arbitration. Informant determination technique:
purposive sampling. Data collection techniques:
interviews and documentation.
Results: Negotiation: The TTS KPU meeting with
Paslon No.2 occurred at the stage of the dispute over
the election results aimed at discussing the findings
that became objections to Paslon No.2 in the 2018
TTS Pilkada. The meeting was attended by Paslon
No.2 along with several TPS witnesses and the
success team and from security."
Conslusion: The 2018 TTS Regency Pilkada conflict
occurred at the disputed stage of the election results,
this was because in the Determination of the Vote
Count Result for the 2018 South Central Timor
Regent and Deputy Regent Election there were
incomplete and inauthentic documents to conduct the
election, namely the original C1-KWK Model Form
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 288
with holograms and The original Model C1.Plano-
KWK form has a hologram at 30 polling stations so
that the validity of the vote is not guaranteed. A
conflict occurred between one pair of candidates
(Drs. Obed Naitboho, M.Si and Alexander Kase,
S.Pdk) and the TTS KPU as the election organizer.
Keywords: Conflict; Pilkada; Abitration, Mediation
and Conciliation.
*Correspondent Author : Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu
Email : akedabu@gmail.com
BACKGROUND
General elections are a form of community freedom and individual
rationality to choose their leaders. This has a correlation with the formation of
regional government as a form of regional community rationality which is realized
through the direct election of Regional Heads and Deputy Regional Heads. The
purpose of holding direct elections is to form a strong government based on the
choice and legitimacy of the people. Regional heads and deputy regional heads are
elected in one pair of candidates which is carried out democratically based on the
principles of direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair. The direct election
is a series of democratic rails to be realized in order to increase the value of
democracy at the regional level. With the direct election of regional heads, the
aspirations and political desires of the people at the lowest level will be channeled.
Because, essentially with this direct choice, what will be chosen is not a mere
figure, but a concept of development in the region in the future (Anshori, 2016).
However, in the midst of good changes, of course, it is very difficult to
achieve the word perfect because in the process there are still violations in the
Pilkada itself that cause (Yarsina, 2020) conflicts in the Pilkada. This happened in
the 2018 South Central Timor Pilkada where in the Determination of the
Recapitulation of the Vote Count Results for the 2018 South Central Timor Regent
and Deputy Regent elections there were incomplete and inauthentic documents for
conducting the election, namely the original hologram C1-KWK Model Form and
Form (Asfar, 2006) The original C1 Plano-KWK model had holograms at 30
polling stations so that the validity of the votes was not guaranteed, for example
there were 21 TPS not found the original C1Plano-KWK form with a hologram in
the ballot box but found using other media such as kasdus paper, oil paper,
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 289
candidate pair list paper and paper recapitulation formats in PPK such as the plano
DAA and DA plano forms. And there are 9 TPS where C1 KWK Original
Hologram was not found. The documents found were C1 KWK without a
hologram. TPS 2 Pollo Village, South Amanuban District (Armunanto, 2015),
TPS 1, TPS 2, TPS 3 and TPS 4 Fenun Village, TPS 4 Kualeu Village, TPS 1 and
TPS 2, Lanu Village, TPS 3 Anin Village, TPS 2 Fae Village, South Amanatun
District, TPS 4 Boentuka Village, Batu Putih District, TPS 1 Nefokoko Village
And TPS 1 Halme Village, North Mollo District, TPS 1 Koa Village And TPS 1
Oeluban Village (Bratakusumah & Solihin, 2002 ), West Mollo District, TPS 1
Leonmeni Village, Boking District, TPS 4 Nunusunu Village (Brown, Hale, &
King, 2019), Kualin District, TPS 1 And TPS 2 Besleu Village, Fautmolo District,
TPS 1 Tesiayofanu Village, TPS 1 , TPS 2 and TPS 3 in Fatu Ulan Village, TPS 1,
TPS2, TPS3 and TPS 4 in Falas Village, Ki'e District, TPS 3 in Minesatbubuk
Village, TPS 1 and TPS 2 in Laob Village, Polen District (DARMAWAN, 2013).
Through this study, the authors provide an analysis of election conflict
management that can minimize potential conflict and election conflict
management in Timor Tengah Selatan district in the next and subsequent periods
(Gayatri, 2015). This research is expected to become a proposed concept of
election conflict management in both the South Central Timor district and in other
districts experiencing electoral conflict. This research is intended to be a concept
of election conflict management in the South Central Timor district in the next
election (RUDI HERLIYANTO, Kusnadi, & Marlina, 2019).
RESEARCH METHODS
The type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative
approach. Sugiyono (2015) suggests that descriptive research is research
conducted to determine the value of independent variables, either one or more
(independent) variables without making comparisons or connecting one variable to
another (Hikmat, 2014).
This research was conducted in TTS Regency (South Central Timor), East
Nusa Tenggara Province. Taking into account that the TTS (South Central Timor)
Regency, at the time of the election of regional heads simultaneously in 171
regions, namely 17 provinces, 115 regencies (Anggraini, Afrizal, & Indradin,
2019), and 39 cities was one of the regions that had problems in the process.
Pilkada, namely the Determination of the Recapitulation of Vote Count Results for
the Election of the Regent and Deputy Regent of South Central Timor in 2018
there were incompleteness (Satris et al., 2019) and inauthentic documents for
conducting the election, namely the original hologram C1-KWK Model Form and
the original Plano-KWK Model C1 Form holograms at 30 polling stations so that
the validity of the votes is not guaranteed (Kusworo, 2019). The focus of the
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 290
research is based on conflict management proposed by Dianne Schilling to
measure conflict management in the 2018 South Central Timor District Election.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. South Central Timor Election Conflict in 2018
As for the disputes or problems that occurred in the implementation of the
2018 regional elections for TTS Regency, namely at the stage of dispute over
election results (Sabrina, 2020), this was due to the determination of the Vote
Count Result Recapitulation for the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and Deputy
Regent Elections where there were incompleteness (Pateman, 1970) and
inauthentic documents for conducting elections, namely the original ModelC1-
KWK Form with the hologram and the original ModelC1.Plano-KWK Form with
the hologram at 30 TPS so that the validity of the votes is not guaranteed
(Purwanto, 2005), namely:
B. 2018 South Central Timor Pilkada Conflict Resolution
Negotiation Negotiation is a process that involves two or three parties to
negotiate several options of opinion that become a source of conflict to reach a
mutual agreement that is mutually beneficial to both parties (Putra, 2009).
Negotiations in the Settlement of the 2018 South Central Timor Pilkada Conflict
were shown by the meeting of Paslon No. 2 (Obed Naitboho-Alexander Kase)
with the success team and several witnesses at several polling stations with the
Chairperson of the TTS KPU and his staff at the TTS KPU two days after the
determination of the recapitulation (Mazzarella, 2006) of the results of the district
level vote count. The meeting was also attended by security forces, namely the
TTS Police and KODIM to carry out security in the negotiation process (Anwar,
2018).
The purpose of the negotiation was to discuss the findings of the witnesses
and the success team of Paslon No. 2 (Obed Naitboho-Alexander Kase) during the
voting to the recapitulation of the results of the calculations which became the
objection of Paslon No. 2 to the results of the 2018 Regional Head Election
(Siswanto, 2017) in TTS Regency. The findings include, at some polling stations
the original Plano-KWK C1 form with a hologram in the ballot box was not found
but was found using other media such as cardboard, oil paper and candidate pair
list paper (Surbakti & Nugroho, 2015).
In this case, the TTS KPU as a party to the conflict and also as an election
organizer becomes a facilitator in resolving the Pilkada conflict. The task of the
TTS KPU related to this issue (Thapa, 2020) is to facilitate step by step the
settlement of the pilkada conflict by directing Paslon No. 2 to resolve the dispute
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 291
over the results of the South Central Timor Regency Election using arbitration
steps (Achyani, Gana, & Kase, 2015).
Negotiation Negotiation is a process that involves two or three parties to
negotiate several options of opinion that become a source of conflict to reach a
mutual agreement that is mutually beneficial to both parties (Putra, 2009).
Negotiations in the Settlement of the 2018 South Central Timor Pilkada Conflict
were shown by the meeting of Paslon No. 2 (Obed Naitboho-Alexander Kase)
with the success team and several witnesses at several polling stations with the
Chairperson of the TTS KPU and his staff at the TTS KPU two days after the
determination of the recapitulation (Mazzarella, 2006) of the results of the district
level vote count. The meeting was also attended by security forces, namely the
TTS Police and KODIM to carry out security in the negotiation process (Anwar,
2018).
The purpose of the negotiation was to discuss the findings of the witnesses
and the success team of Paslon No. 2 (Obed Naitboho-Alexander Kase) during the
voting to the recapitulation of the results of the calculations which became the
objection of Paslon No. 2 to the results of the 2018 Regional Head Election
(Siswanto, 2017) in TTS Regency. The findings include, at some polling stations
the original Plano-KWK C1 form with a hologram in the ballot box was not found
but was found using other media such as cardboard, oil paper and candidate pair
list paper (Surbakti & Nugroho, 2015).
In this case, the TTS KPU as a party to the conflict and also as an election
organizer becomes a facilitator in resolving the Pilkada conflict. The task of the
TTS KPU related to this issue (Thapa, 2020) is to facilitate step by step the
settlement of the pilkada conflict by directing Paslon No. 2 to resolve the dispute
over the results of the South Central Timor Regency Election using arbitration
steps (Achyani, Gana, & Kase, 2015).
C. Interlocutory decision read out on 29 August 2019
Ordered the General Election Commission of South Central Timor
Regency to conduct a recount of the 2018 South Central Timor Regency Regent
and Deputy Regent Elections at the South Central Timor Regency KPU by
matching the original C1-KWK Form with a hologram with the original Plano-
KWK Form C1 with a hologram, with witnessed by the Petitioner's witnesses and
Related Parties before the Election Supervisory Committee for the South Central
Timor Regency, Ordered the said recount to be carried out no later than 14
(fourteen) days after this decision was pronounced.
The General Election Commission for South Central Timor Regency
which is supervised by the General Election Commission for East Nusa Tenggara
Province and the General Election Commission in carrying out the recounting of
the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and Deputy Regent Elections, Orders the
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 292
Election Supervisory Committee for South Central Timor Regency to carry out
supervised supervision by the East Nusa Tenggara Provincial Election
Supervisory Board and the General Election Supervisory Body in the
implementation of the vote recount for the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and
Deputy Regent Election.
Instruct the General Election Commission for South Central Timor
Regency, the General Election Commission for East Nusa Tenggara Province,
and the General Election Commission to report to the Court regarding the results
of the vote count in the recount of the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and
Deputy Regent Elections no later than - no later than 3 (three) working days after
the recounting of the votes is carried out, Order the Election Supervisory
Committee for the South Central Timor Regency, the Election Supervisory Board
for the East Nusa Tenggara Province, and the General Election Supervisory Body
to report to the Court regarding the results of the vote count in the counting. re-
vote for the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and Deputy Regent Election no
later than 3 (three) working days after the re-count is carried out. Ordered the
Indonesian National Police and their staff, in particular the Indonesian National
Police for the East Nusa Tenggara Province, to secure the recount process until
the report is submitted to the Court according to their authority.
D. Mediation
Following up on the Constitutional Court's decision, KPU TTS mediated
with the KPU of NTT Province and KPU of the Republic of Indonesia in
connection with the implementation of the re-count of votes for the South Central
Timor Regent and Deputy Regent. Based on the results of the mediation, the
South Central Timor Regency KPU issued Decree Number
30/HK/KPTS/5302.KPU.KAB/ VIII/2018 concerning Stages, Activities and
Schedules for Re-counting the 2018 South Central Timor Regency Regent and
Deputy Regent Election as Follow-up to the Decision of the Constitutional Court
Number 61/PHP.BUP-XVI/2018 dated 31 August 2018.
E. Conciliation
The series of activities (Table 2) above is a form of conciliation in
resolving the TTS Pilkada conflict because it was attended by each Candidate
Pair, Witnesses from Candidate Pairs and under the Supervision of the South
Central Timor Regency Supervisory Committee, with supervision from the East
Nusa Tenggara Province Bawaslu and Republican Bawaslu Indonesia, and in its
implementation the South Central Timor Regency KPU is supervised by the East
Nusa Tenggara Provincial KPU and the Republic of Indonesia KPU, and also
from the East Nusa Tenggara Regional Police, East Nusa Tenggara Regional
Police Mobile Brigade, South Central Timor Resort Police, KODIM 1621.
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 293
F. The decision of the Constitutional Court on 18 September 2019 is as
follows
Stating that there are incomplete and inauthentic documents to conduct
elections in the 2018 Election of Regent and Deputy Regent of Timor Tengah
Selatan Regency, namely the original holographic Model C1-KWK Form and the
original hologram C1. Plano-KWK Model Form as specified in the laws and
regulations at 30 polling stations so that the validity of the vote is not guaranteed.
Canceling the Decision of the General Election Commission of Timor Tengah
Selatan Regency Number 19/HK/Kpt/5302/KPU-Kab/VII/2018 concerning the
Determination of the Recapitulation of Vote Count Results for the 2018 Election
of the Regent and Deputy Regent of South Central Timor, dated July 8, 2018
insofar as it relates to the acquisition vote at 30 polling stations. Ordered the
General Election Commission of Timor Tengah Selatan Regency to carry out re-
voting for the 2018 Election of Regent and Deputy Regent of Timor Tengah
Selatan Regency at 30 TPS. Order the re-voting to be carried out no later than 30
(thirty) days after this decision is pronounced.
CONCLUSION
The 2018 TTS District Election conflict occurred at the stage of dispute
over the election results, this was due to the Determination of the Vote Counting
Results for the 2018 South Central Timor Regent and Deputy Regent Elections
where there were incomplete and inauthentic documents for conducting elections,
namely the original C1-KWK Model Form with a hologram and The original
C1.Plano-KWK Model Form had a hologram at 30 TPS so that the validity of the
vote acquisition was not guaranteed. The conflict occurred between one of the
candidate pairs (Drs. Obed Naitboho, M.Sc and Alexander Kase, S.Pdk) and KPU
TTS as the election organizer.
BIBLIOGRAFI
Achyani, Febriyana Tri, Gana, Frans, & Kase, Petrus. (2015). Efektivitas
Hubungan Kerja Komisioner dengan Sekretariat Komisi Pemilihan Umum
Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi
Publik), 19(1), 43–58.
Anggraini, Sri, Afrizal, Afrizal, & Indradin, Indradin. (2019). Regulasi Konflik
Pemilu (Studi Kasus Resolusi Konflik Pilkada 2015 dan Persiapan Pemilu
2019 di Kabupaten Sijunjung). Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya,
21(2), 177–184.
Anshori, Akhyar. (2016). Berita Pilkada Dalam Bingkai Media Cetak.
Anwar, Khoirul. (2018). Urgensi penerapan manajemen konflik dalam organisasi
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 294
pendidikan. Al-Fikri: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 1(2),
31–38.
Armunanto, Andi Ali. (2015). Potensi Konflik pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Langsung di Kota Makassar Tahun 2013. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister
Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 1(1), 23–36.
Asfar, Muhammad. (2006). Mendesain managemen pilkada: panduan bagi
stakeholders: dilengkapi contoh-contoh SK KPUD dan evaluasi pilkadi
2005. Pustaka Eureka.
Bratakusumah, Deddy Supriady, & Solihin, D. (2002). Penyelenggaraan
Pemerintahan Otonomi Daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Brown, Mitchell, Hale, Kathleen, & King, Bridgett A. (2019). The future of
election administration: Cases and conversations. Springer Nature.
DARMAWAN, IKHSAN DARMAWAN IKHSAN. (2013). Bentuk Resolusi
Konflik Dalam Pilkada: Kasus Pilkada Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten
Jepara. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 1(1), 63–83.
Gayatri, Gayatri. (2015). KONFLIK KEKUASAAN DALAM ANGGARAN
PEMILUKADA PROVINSI BALI. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 111–142.
Hikmat, Mahi M. (2014). Pemetaan Masalah dan Solusi Konflik Lokal dalam
Pilkada Langsung di Indonesia. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan,
30(1), 18–27.
Kusworo, Kusworo. (2019). Manajemen Konflik dan Perubahan dalam
Organisasi. Manajemen Konflik Dan Perubahan Dalam Organisasi.
Mazzarella, William. (2006). Internet X-ray: e-governance, transparency, and the
politics of immediation in India. Public Culture, 18(3), 473–505.
Pateman, Carole. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge
University Press.
Purwanto, Erwan Agus. (2005). Pelayanan Publik Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Gajah
Mada UniversityPress.
Putra, A. A. Gede Febri Purnama. (2009). Peran Negara dalam Menciptakan
Perdamaian: Kasus Pilkada Langsung di Kab. Gianyar dan Kab. Buleleng,
Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 13(2), 172–189.
RUDI HERLIYANTO, SIP152070, Kusnadi, Dedek, & Marlina, Siti. (2019).
ANALISIS KONFLIK PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA
DAERAH KABUPATEN TEBO PROVINSI JAMBI TAHUN 2017. UIN
Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.
Sabrina, Annisa. (2020). “Islamisasi Etnik Tionghoa di Kota Medan, Tahun 1961-
1998”. UIN Sumatera Utara Medan.
Satris, Rezki, Aswar, Hasbi, Sahide, Ahmad, Hidayat, Alfian, Baidawi, Ahmad,
Kuswardini, Seftina, Achsin, Muhaimin Zulhair, Dewi, Sannya Pestari,
Anam, Syaiful, & Fadillah, Chaerunnisa Wahyu. (2019). ISU-ISU
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 295
HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL KONTEMPORER: PERSPEKTIF
MULTIDISIPLIN.
Siswanto, Edhi. (2017). Konflik Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Jember
Tahun 2015 (Conflict Of Elections For District Head Of Jember In 2015).
POLITICO, 17(2).
Surbakti, Ramlan, & Nugroho, Kris. (2015). Studi Tentang Desain Kelembagaan
Pemilu yang Efektif.
Thapa, Ishwor. (2020). Public Administration: Meaning, Scope and Its Nature.
Tribhuvan University. DOI: Https://10.13140/RG, 2(33704.80641).
Widodo, Wahyu. (2015). Pelaksanaan pilkada berdasarkan asas demokrasi dan
nilai-nilai pancasila. Civis, 5(1).
Yarsina, Nova. (2020). KEWENANGAN PANITIA PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN
UMUM DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH. Ensiklopedia Social
Review, 2(3), 297–303.
Achyani, Febriyana Tri, Gana, Frans, & Kase, Petrus. (2015). Efektivitas
Hubungan Kerja Komisioner dengan Sekretariat Komisi Pemilihan Umum
Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi
Publik), 19(1), 43–58.
Anggraini, Sri, Afrizal, Afrizal, & Indradin, Indradin. (2019). Regulasi Konflik
Pemilu (Studi Kasus Resolusi Konflik Pilkada 2015 dan Persiapan Pemilu
2019 di Kabupaten Sijunjung). Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya,
21(2), 177–184.
Anshori, Akhyar. (2016). Berita Pilkada Dalam Bingkai Media Cetak.
Anwar, Khoirul. (2018). Urgensi penerapan manajemen konflik dalam organisasi
pendidikan. Al-Fikri: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 1(2),
31–38.
Armunanto, Andi Ali. (2015). Potensi Konflik pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah
Langsung di Kota Makassar Tahun 2013. The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister
Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 1(1), 23–36.
Asfar, Muhammad. (2006). Mendesain managemen pilkada: panduan bagi
stakeholders: dilengkapi contoh-contoh SK KPUD dan evaluasi pilkadi
2005. Pustaka Eureka.
Bratakusumah, Deddy Supriady, & Solihin, D. (2002). Penyelenggaraan
Pemerintahan Otonomi Daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Brown, Mitchell, Hale, Kathleen, & King, Bridgett A. (2019). The future of
election administration: Cases and conversations. Springer Nature.
DARMAWAN, IKHSAN DARMAWAN IKHSAN. (2013). Bentuk Resolusi
Konflik Dalam Pilkada: Kasus Pilkada Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten
Jepara. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 1(1), 63–83.
Gayatri, Gayatri. (2015). KONFLIK KEKUASAAN DALAM ANGGARAN
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 296
PEMILUKADA PROVINSI BALI. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 111–142.
Hikmat, Mahi M. (2014). Pemetaan Masalah dan Solusi Konflik Lokal dalam
Pilkada Langsung di Indonesia. MIMBAR: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan,
30(1), 18–27.
Kusworo, Kusworo. (2019). Manajemen Konflik dan Perubahan dalam
Organisasi. Manajemen Konflik Dan Perubahan Dalam Organisasi.
Mazzarella, William. (2006). Internet X-ray: e-governance, transparency, and the
politics of immediation in India. Public Culture, 18(3), 473–505.
Pateman, Carole. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge
University Press.
Purwanto, Erwan Agus. (2005). Pelayanan Publik Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Gajah
Mada UniversityPress.
Putra, A. A. Gede Febri Purnama. (2009). Peran Negara dalam Menciptakan
Perdamaian: Kasus Pilkada Langsung di Kab. Gianyar dan Kab. Buleleng,
Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 13(2), 172–189.
RUDI HERLIYANTO, SIP152070, Kusnadi, Dedek, & Marlina, Siti. (2019).
ANALISIS KONFLIK PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILIHAN KEPALA
DAERAH KABUPATEN TEBO PROVINSI JAMBI TAHUN 2017. UIN
Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.
Sabrina, Annisa. (2020). “Islamisasi Etnik Tionghoa di Kota Medan, Tahun 1961-
1998”. UIN Sumatera Utara Medan.
Satris, Rezki, Aswar, Hasbi, Sahide, Ahmad, Hidayat, Alfian, Baidawi, Ahmad,
Kuswardini, Seftina, Achsin, Muhaimin Zulhair, Dewi, Sannya Pestari,
Anam, Syaiful, & Fadillah, Chaerunnisa Wahyu. (2019). ISU-ISU
HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL KONTEMPORER: PERSPEKTIF
MULTIDISIPLIN.
Siswanto, Edhi. (2017). Konflik Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Jember
Tahun 2015 (Conflict Of Elections For District Head Of Jember In 2015).
POLITICO, 17(2).
Surbakti, Ramlan, & Nugroho, Kris. (2015). Studi Tentang Desain Kelembagaan
Pemilu yang Efektif.
Thapa, Ishwor. (2020). Public Administration: Meaning, Scope and Its Nature.
Tribhuvan University. DOI: Https://10.13140/RG, 2(33704.80641).
Widodo, Wahyu. (2015). Pelaksanaan pilkada berdasarkan asas demokrasi dan
nilai-nilai pancasila. Civis, 5(1).
Yarsina, Nova. (2020). KEWENANGAN PANITIA PENGAWAS PEMILIHAN
UMUM DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH. Ensiklopedia Social
Review, 2(3), 297–303.
Oktavianus Anggriawan Kedabu / JOSR: Journal of Social Research, 1(11),286-297
Convenient Election Conflict Managemen (Case Study Of The 2018 South
Central Elections) 297
© 2021 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under
the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA)
license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).
